(مقالات این شماره فصلنامه، به مقالات منتخب سیزدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت اختصاص یافته است.)شناسایی مکانیزم‌های تاثیرگذاری ترکیب هیئت‌مدیره بر شیوه‌ی اسناددهی نتیجه‌ عملکرد

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستقل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد مدیریت MBA؛ دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

2 دانشیاردانشکده‌ی مدیریت و اقتصاد؛ دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

چکیده

در این مقاله مکانیزم­های تاثیرگذاری ترکیب اعضای هیئت­مدیره از لحاظ ترکیب هیئت‌مدیره از منظر موظف بودن اعضا بر روی شیوه­ی اسناددهی جمعی در هیئت­مدیره مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. برای مطالعه­ی این موضوع، تفاوت ارائه­ی اطلاعات و قضاوت­­های اسناددهی اعضای موظف و غیرموظف و چگونگی شکل­گیری اسناددهی جمعی هیئت­مدیره در مورد یک رویداد مشخص در یک شرکت در صنعت مخابرات موردکاوی شده­است. داده­های این موردکاوی از طریق مصاحبه­ی نیمه ­ساختاریافته با تمامی اعضای هیئت­مدیره­ی آن شرکت جمع­آوری شده و از طریق کد گذاری و تحلیل روابط بین کدها بررسی شده است. نتیجه­ی این موردکاوی نشان می­دهد که اعضای موظف و غیرموظف این شرکت مجموعه­ی متفاوتی از متغیرهای کسب­وکار را تحت کنترل و نفوذ خود می­پندارند، و بر اساس همین حوزه­ی کنترل درک­شده­شان اطلاعات را بر می­گزینند و قضاوت اسناددهی شخصی­شان را شکل می­دهند. در مرحله­ی تضارب آراء و قضاوت­های اعضا نیز اعضایی که قدرت مقبولیت بالاتری داشته­اند، تاثیر بیشتری بر جمع­بندی و توافق اعضا بر روی یک اسناددهی جمعی گذاشته­اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of influence mechanisms of executive/non-executive board composition on board’s attribution about firm performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamed Helali 1
  • Seyyed Babak Alavi 2
چکیده [English]

This article intends to identify the influence mechanisms of executive/non-executive board composition, on board attribution about firm performance. To this end, the case study method was chosen. In the case study, each member’s causal interpretation of a critical incident, how executives and non-executives think differently, and their process of coming to a collectively agreed attribution was investigated. Data was gathered through semi-structured interviews with all members of the board and was analyzed using qualitative techniques. According to the results, board of directors’ collective attribution formation process can be divided into three stages of members’ expression of perceived information and facts at board meetings, forming the individual judgments of members, and at last, agreement on the collectively admitted attribution. We found that individual attribution judgments are directed by members’ perceived scope of control, and this perceived scope of control may differ systematically in executive and non-executive members. At the stage of agreement on a collective attribution, board members’ referent power determines the weight of their judgments in the collective attribution

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corporate Governance
  • Board Configuration
  • Attribution Theory
  • Collective Cognition
  • Organizational Learning

مراجع

Andres, P. d. & Vallelado, E., 2008. Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), p. 2570–2580.
Bettman, J. R. & Weitz, B. A., 1983. Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), pp. 165-183.
Cadbury, A., 1992. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London: Gee Publishing.
Carmeli, A., Tishler, A. & Edmondson, A. C., 2012. CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), pp. 31-54.
Daily, C. M. & Dalton, a. D. R., 2015. Corporate governance in the small firm: Prescriptions for CEOs and directors. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 5(1), pp. 57-68.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. & Cannella, A. A., 2003. Corporate Governance Decades of Dialogue and Data. The Academy of Management Review, pp. 371-382.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. & Jr., A. A. C., 2003. Corporate Governance Decades of Dialogue and Data. The Academy of Management Review, pp. 371-382.
Deborah, S., 2002. Motivation to learn, Integrating theory and Practice. 4th ed. Boston, Massachussets: A Pearson Publication Company.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Graebner, M. E., 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), p. 25–32.
Forbes, D. T. & Milliken, F. J., 1999. Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-making Groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), pp. 489-505.
Gibson, C. B. & Earley, P. C., 2007. Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. Academy of management review, 32(2), pp. 438-458.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y. & Neale, M. A., 1996. Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, pp. 1-15.
Haleblian, J. & Rajagopalan, N., 2006. A Cognitive Model of CEO Dismissal: Understanding the Influence of Board Perceptions, Attributions and Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), pp. 1009-1026.
Harvey, P. et al., 2014. Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences: The Road Traveled and The Path Ahead. The Academy of Management Perspectives, p. 128–146.
Harvey, P. et al., 2014. Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences: The Road Traveled and the Path Ahead. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), pp. 128-146.
He, L. & Fang, J., 2016. CEO Overpayment and Dismissal: The Role of Attribution and Attention. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(1), pp. 24-41.
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C. & Nicholson, G., 2010. How Boards Strategise: A Strategy as Practice View. Long Range Planning, Volume 43, pp. 33-56.
Huse, M., 2000. Boards of Directors in SMEs: a Review and Research Agenda. ENTREPRENEURSHIP & REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, pp. 271-290.
Kelley, H. H., 1973. The Processes of Causal Attribution. American Psychologist, pp. 107-128.
Kelley, H. H. & Michela, J. L., 1980. Attribution theory and research. Annual review of psychology, Volume 31, pp. 457-501.
Klimoski, R. & Mohammed, S., 1994. Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?. Journal of Management , pp. 403-437 .
Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J. & Batra, B., 1992. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistance and reorientation: An emperical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 13, pp. 585-608.
Martinko, M. j., Harvey, P. & Dasborough, M. T., 2011. Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1(32), p. 144–149.
McNulty, T., Zattoni, A. & Douglas, T., 2013. Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), pp. 183-198.
Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L. & Hamilton, K., 2010. Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), pp. 876-910.
Murphy, S. A. & McIntyre, M. L., 2007. Board of director performance: a group dynamics perspective. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 7(2), pp. 209-224.
OECD, 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, s.l.: ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT.
Raven, B. H., 1993. The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of social issues, 49(4), pp. 227-251.
Rindova, V. P., 1999. What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 7(36), pp. 953-975.
Schaffer, B. S., 2002. Board assessments of managerial performance: An analysis of attribution processes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(2), pp. 95 - 115.
Stevenson, W. B., Pearce, J. L. & Porter, L. W., 1985. The Concept of “Coalition” in Organization Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), pp. 256-268.
Sun, Y. & Shin, T., 2014. Rewarding Poor Performance: Why Do Boards of Directors Increase New Options in Response to CEO Underwater Options?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), p. 408–421.
Uhlaner, L., Wright, M. & Huse, M., 2007. Private Firms and Corporate Governance: An Integrated Economic and Management Perspective. Small Business Economics, p. 225–241.
Walsh, J. P., Henderson, C. M. & Deighton, J., 1988. Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(2), pp. 194-216.
Walsh, J. P. & Seward, J. K., 1990. On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review, pp. 421-458.
Weiner, B., 2008. Reflections on the history of attribution theory and research: People, personalities, publications, problems. Social Psychology, 39(3), pp. 151-156.
Zattoni, A. & Cuomo, F., 2010. How Independent, Competent and Incentivized Should Non‐executive Directors Be?. British Journal of Management, 21(1), p. 63–79.
Zattoni, A., Douglas, T. & Judge, W., 2013. Developing corporate governance theory through qualitative research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), pp. 119-122.
بهادار, س. ب. ا., 1386. آئین‌نامه‌ی نظام راهبری شرکتی, تهران: s.n.
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار