Iranian journal of management sciences

Iranian journal of management sciences

Role Enactment Pattern of Networked Dynamic Capabilities in Iran’s Steel Innovation Ecosystem

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University
2 Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 management and accounting faculty, Allameh Tabataba’i University
100/jiams.2026.9151.7967
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, firms have faced increasing dynamism resulting from rapid technological development, digitalization, and sustainability requirements. This condition creates new opportunities for innovation within ecosystems. This issue is particularly evident in capital-intensive and network-based industries such as steel and highlights the importance of capabilities that can manage such dynamism and create sustainable value flows within the ecosystem. By adopting the perspectives of dynamic capabilities and innovation ecosystems, this study examines the pattern through which network-oriented dynamic capabilities contribute to value creation and value orchestration in the Iranian steel innovation ecosystem and seeks to provide an integrated understanding of these capabilities at the ecosystem level.





Methodology: This applied study was conducted using a qualitative approach. The research population consisted of key actors in the Iranian steel innovation ecosystem. Using purposive and snowball sampling, ten participants, including managers, industry experts, academics, and representatives of technology-based firms, were selected until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify and explain the mechanisms through which network-oriented dynamic capabilities contribute to the realization of value flows.





Findings: The findings indicate that network-oriented dynamic capabilities contribute to value flows in the Iranian steel innovation ecosystem through a set of ecosystem mechanisms in a processual and continuous manner. The sensing capability guides value flows from the initial identification of opportunities to the formation of actual value creation pathways through exploratory activities, identification of actors’ potential capacities, creation and development of informational and knowledge linkages, and recognition of structural positions and interdependencies. The seizing capability transforms identified opportunities into sustainable value flows by relying on the adjustment and alignment of activities, adjustment and stabilization of actors’ roles, configuration of organizational positions and boundaries, and coordination of interorganizational linkages. Simultaneously, the reconfiguring capability contributes to strengthening and sustaining value flows under technological changes, market dynamics, and structural transformations in the Iranian steel industry through the rearrangement of activities, redefinition of actors’ roles, reconfiguration of linkages, and redefinition of positions.





Conclusion: The results show that, in the Iranian steel innovation ecosystem, network-oriented dynamic capabilities do not operate as isolated firm-level capabilities but rather as network, interactive, and institutional mechanisms at the ecosystem level. Through the orchestration, exploitation, and regeneration of value flows, these capabilities enable coordination, joint learning, and continuous renewal in response to environmental changes. Accordingly, by extending the dynamic capabilities perspective from the firm level to the ecosystem level, this study demonstrates that value creation and value continuity in complex and capital-intensive industries depend less on the independent performance of individual actors and more on the organization and alignment of ecosystem mechanisms. Therefore, the proposed model can provide a basis for designing and orchestrating innovation ecosystems and for strengthening sustainable innovation, ecosystem resilience, and collaborative value creation, particularly in capital-intensive and network-based industries.


Keywords
Subjects

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Feiler, D. (2019). Interdependence, perception, and investment choices: An experimental approach to decision making in innovation ecosystems. Organization science, 30(1), 109-125.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Alinaghian, L., & Razmdoost, K. (2018). How do network resources affect firms' network-oriented dynamic capabilities? Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 79-94.
Allred, C. R., Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., & Magnan, G. M. (2011). A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage. Decision sciences, 42(1), 129-161.
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. The Oxford handbook of innovation management.
Ahmadloo, R. K., Moazez, H., Mohammadi, M., Yazdani, H., & Zarei Matin, H. (2020). Meta-synthesis of factors affecting the formation and development of university-based innovation ecosystems. Journal of Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 3(3), 97–130. (in Persian).
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. (2022). Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts. Innovation & Management Review, 19(1), 12-25.
Baldwin, C. Y., Bogers, M. L., Kapoor, R., & West, J. (2024). Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies. Research policy, 53(3), 104949.
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of management, 36(1), 256-280.
Bauld, S., & Minifie, J. R. (2025). INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS: A MULTI-REGIONAL CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ENVIRONMENTS.
Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2020). Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. International journal of production economics, 228, 107735.
Benitez, J., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information & management, 55(4), 508-523.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic management of open innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. California management review, 62(1), 77-94.
 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328-352
Clifford Defee, C., & Fugate, B. S. (2010). Changing perspective of capabilities in the dynamic supply chain era. The international journal of logistics management, 21(2), 180-206.
Corallo, A., & Protopapa, S. (2007). Business networks and ecosystems: rethinking the biological metaphor. In Digital business ecosystems (pp. 60-66). European Commission.
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466-498.
de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Flechas, X. A., Facin, A. L. F., & Borini, F. M. (2021). Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises. Technological forecasting and social change, 171, 120950.
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 18-29.
Dyer,J. H., & Singh, H. (1998).The relational view:Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review,23(4),660-679.
Ellström, D., Holtström, J., Berg, E., & Josefsson, C. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 272-286.
Elyasi, M., & Malekifar, F. (2021). Innovation ecosystem: From metaphor to guide. National Research Institute for Science Policy. (in Persian).
Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59.
Feng, N., Fu, C., Wei, F., Peng, Z., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, K. H. (2019). The key role of dynamic capabilities in the evolutionary process for a startup to develop into an innovation ecosystem leader: An indepth case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 54, 81-96.
Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2005). Logistics innovation: a customer value‐oriented social process. Journal of business logistics, 26(1), 113-147.
Furr, N., & Shipilov, A. (2018). Building the right ecosystem for innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 59-64.
Ganco, M., Kapoor, R., & Lee, G. K. (2020). From rugged landscapes to rugged ecosystems: Structure of interdependencies and firms’ innovative search. Academy of management review, 45(3), 646-674.
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133-139.
Havenvid, M. I., de Boer, L., & Holmen, E. (2022). The role of interaction in achieving increased sustainability in supply networks. In.
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939.
Heidary, M., Ansari, R., Jahanyan, S., & Palizdar, Y. (2025). Investigating the Causal Relationships among the Variables Influencing the Corporate Innovation Ecosystem The Case of Mobarakeh Steel Company. Research in Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 95-120.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research policy, 47(8), 1391-1399.
Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic management journal, 32(11), 1243-1250.
Iran,S.P.A.o. (2025). Iran steel industry performance report Eight months of 2025.(in Persian).
IMIDRO. (2023). Strategic development plan of Iran’s steel industry. (in Persian).
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Kindström, D., Kowalkowski, C., & Sandberg, E. (2013). Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1063-1073.
Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjödin, D., & Heikkilä, V. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 118, 12-25.
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2018). Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning? Technological forecasting and social change, 137, 330-339.
Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Kessler, A., & Schweiger, C. (2019). Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(5), 1149-1172.
Leite, E. (2022). Innovation networks for social impact: An empirical study on multi-actor collaboration in projects for smart cities. Journal of Business Research, 139, 325-337.
Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological forecasting and social change, 166, 120614.
Lütjen, H., Schultz, C., Tietze, F., & Urmetzer, F. (2019). Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research, 104, 506-519.
Mele, C., Nenonen, S., Pels, J., Storbacka, K., Nariswari, A., & Kaartemo, V. (2018). Shaping service ecosystems: exploring the dark side of agency. Journal of Service Management, 29(4), 521-545.